Arguments for non-verbal inspiration
Argument One
Paul writes by permission – 1 Cor. 7:6, 12, 25, 40
Argument Two
Bible states various forms of communication – Heb. 1:1
Argument Three
The apostle John told to write what he saw – Rev. 1:19-20
Argument Four
Different styles for different writers
Matthew – “Kingdom of heaven”
John – “little children”
Paul – sports
(Wrestle – Eph 6:12 Box – 1 Cor. 9:26 Run – 1 Cor 9:24)
(note: Paul used personal terms and signed all letters)
(Luke – used medical term (needle)
Argument Five
Different sources and approaches for different books
Hebrews – Reflects writings based on much study
Luke – Reflects writings based on experience and research (Luke 1)
Argument Six
Difference in historical accounts
Order – Matt 4 and Luke 4
Facts – Matt 8:28 and Mark 5:1
Different renderings of the same events
Mark 16:15,16 Matt 28:19-20 Luke 24:46-48
Argument Seven
Quotations which paraphrase or change original text
Hebrews 2:6-9 (Greek – angels) and Psalms 8:4-6 (Hebrew – God)
Argument Eight
The beauty of the Psalms
“The Lord is my Shepherd . . .” – Psalm 23
“I was glad . . .”- Psalm 122:1
“I will set no. . . ” – Psalm 101:3
“Search me. . .” – Psalm 139:23-24
Observation One
How could Paul be hard to understand? 2 Peter 3:15-16
Observation Two
“God is not the author of confusion”
(So why inspire so as to suggest non-verbal if verbal is correct?
Observation Three
Errors in grammar, tense, etc.
Observation Four
Inconsistency – Arguments on authorship, setting, etc, would be invalid if verbal inspiration were true
Quotations
B.C. Goodpasture, Rex Turner Sr.
Language studies:
Gen 2:7 – Breath of life – 5397 — Job 32:8
inspiration — 2 Tim 3:16